Back to Nikon with a D700
by therider
I am an objective photographer, not a brand name fanatic. I started photography in 2003 with a Nikon FM10 film SLR, since it was more readily available in India. I upgraded the system slowly through an F80, FM3a, and then the D70. Acquired a few lenses, but nothing expensive. Then around 2008, I took a special interest in portraits and started shooting a lot, often indoors in low light. The D70 was a great camera except the noise was unacceptable at ISO 800 and above.
I needed to upgrade and saw no sense to get another DX body, despite being impressed by the high ISO performance of the D300. What I needed in a new Nikon was already in the D3, but I neither had $5k nor wanted such a brick for a body. A good friend of mine suggested the three year old Canon 5D which he has been shooting since it came out and been satisfied all along. I took a risk of brand switch just because I had no expensive Nikkor lens. I managed to sell all the Nikon gear for a good price and was able to start a clean slate with the 5D. I was happy for two things – the kit lens 24-105/4 was an IS lens (my first), and the ISO 1600 images were quite usable, despite some chroma noise. I got a lot of shots I could not get with the D70, and then one day I got hooked into landscape photography as well. I also discovered the great power of RAW and stopped shooting JPG. The RAW processing and 12mp images produced fantastic 12×18 prints to keep me satisfied. Everything was well.
And then, canon came out with 5D markII. 24mp, HD video – Wow ! Ironically these two are precisely the features I just didn’t expect or ever need in an upgrade. Same old AF as in 5D which hunts a lot in low light, and does not track moving kids well. I thought Canon would at least put the AF system of the fantastic 40D in the new body and make a faster frame rate than 3.9fps. It seemed I had hit a wall.
Checked out what was happening in the Nikon camp. Ken Rockwell was all praise about the D700, especially the AF with face detection, even after admitting that 5D2 was still the best camera for landscapes. True that, but I don’t shoot landscapes only. I checked out a D700 at the local store and what can I say, I was blown over. This was the best camera I ever put my hands on. Ergonomics, features, versatility of using older MF nikkors, and the AF totally knocked me out.
Amazon had it $400 less than bhphoto and adorama, so fearing this was a temporary deal, I grabbed one. Picked up a like new Nikkor AF-D 80-200/2.8 off craigslist for a great price. Didn’t care about the VR version since it is $1500 and I can just bump up the ISO if I need to.
So in short, I got the D700 because:
1. World class AF, especially AF tracking
2. Totally usable ISO 6400 with no chroma noise
3. 12mp — I need no more since this is enough for a 20×30 print
4. Ability to use older MF nikkors I can pick up off craigslist for cheap
5D2 lost out because:
1. Same old AF as 5D, hunting in low light and poor tracking
2. 24mp — no thanks
3. HD video — no thanks
I still regret not keeping my Nikon FM3a with AF-D 50/1.8, but hey, I hardly used a 50 on the digital bodies.
Update: Here is a blog post of another Canon user who recently switched to D700.
Hi Joy! Initially I did not know much about cameras, but I’m beginning to realize now how this made me quite ignorant of so many things about cameras and photography.
I mean, hand me a Canon in dire situations and I’d probably have difficulties operating them. Time to broaden my horizons! I am very grateful, because this information I am now interested in photography.
Hi Joy! Your first sentence got to me alright!
We’re the exact opposite — making me subjective, I guess. I have a bias for brand names in whatever field it may be — clothes, shoes, appliances, laptops and, yes, cameras. Nikon has been my constant companion since I began nurturing my interest in photography. My first cameras was a second hand Nikon D6. I’m beginning to realize now how this made me quite ignorant of so many things about cameras and photography. I mean, hand me a Canon or a Leica in dire situations and I’d probably have difficulties operating them. Time to broaden my horizons!
Thanks for your insights!
@ Christie: Well, I don’t know whether being a brand fanatic is good or bad. I think I’m a brand fanatic like you are. Speaking on camera, I love using Nikon. Though I’m not a photographer I think that it is the best one I ever had. When my first camera was lost, I replace it with another brand name. Yet, I don’t know there is something wrong that I buy a new one with ‘Nikon’ name. And when I lost my third camera, I get another Nikon. It still performs well until now.
What an insightful article, Joy. I must admit, though, that I’m a brand fanatic. (Is that good or bad?)
Well, I am, at least when it comes to cameras and photography gear. I tend to opt for either Nikon or Canon only, simply because of their proven efficiency and reliability. I think it’s better to invest in quality items — even though they may be more pricey than others, they always last longer and deliver results better — rather than invest in cheaper ones and end up having to replace them more often.
It’s interesting that you didn’t go for the Canon, and echoes exactly what a photojournalist friend of mine was saying about the 5D mk2. Like many snappers working for newspapers in London, he has long been using the 5D and before that 1Dmk2s and 1DSs. What he and his colleagues have been long saying to Canon is to make a successor to the 5D with a ruggedised body, proper weather proofing and modern auto focus. What did they come back with? Mega pixel count and no weather sealing, plus the same old focusing. Basically Canon completely ignored what the professionals asked them for and came out with a load of snazzy features they knew would get all the press. Sure, a few wealthy enthusiasts will buy it for its high pixel count and video features but the guys who buy them in bulk – photojournalists – don’t want more than 12MP and will never use the video. They just want a tough compact SLR that isn’t going to fall apart in bad weather.
For them the answer is obvious – go with the D700
Not a brand fanatic? LOL… you love Nikon cameras and you switched to Canon 5D just because at that time the 5D was simply the best full frame that could be purchased at an affordable price…

And now you are back to D700 and you jumped on that bandwagon as soon as you and I discussed about it… you couldn’t wait
Anyways one day I will be able to do the switch too… I hope!
Ciao
Great! I am waiting for some photos.
Paul.
looks like 5D lost because of absence of “photographic” improvements as compared to D700. D700 at much less price than 5D mk II makes sense. You know what this has actually created confusion in my mind
Good decision Waiting for some outstanding images